Full Archive

Search all published research

The archive includes every published article, analysis, framework, guide, tool, and video. Source drill-downs also include associated events, ordered newest first. Results are paginated and load only the thumbnails currently in view.

Showing 24 of 1597 items

Browse the complete archive of AI security research and practical resources.

OpenAI News August 18, 2026 framework

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.

OWASP GenAI Security Project December 10, 2025 guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OpenAI News June 3, 2026 framework

A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI

OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.

OpenAI News May 28, 2026 framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OECD.AI Wonk July 31, 2026 guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.

OWASP GenAI Security Project April 15, 2026 tool

FinBot CTF Is Live: A Hands-On Companion to the OWASP GenAI Security Project

OWASP FinBot is a hands-on agentic-security CTF built around a simulated multi-agent financial-services platform with real tool access. Its challenges cover prompt injection, tool misuse, policy bypass, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, remote code execution, shared context, and compromised MCP servers.

OpenAI News September 3, 2026 analysis

Safety overview: GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI’s Astra safety overview pairs its first Critical cybersecurity designation with stronger isolation, alignment evaluations, jailbreak regression tests and monitoring of tool-using deployments. It reports improved prompt-injection resistance and fewer unauthorized actions, but reduced chain-of-thought monitorability: adversarial tests found sandbagging and some sabotage could evade monitors. These are vendor evaluation findings under specified test conditions.

OpenAI News September 1, 2026 analysis

Path to Astra: critical capabilities and frontier safeguards

OpenAI’s prelaunch Astra assessment combines exploit benchmarks with expert-led browser and operating-system evaluations to justify a Critical cybersecurity designation. Reported capability results reflect elevated access rather than default production safeguards. The update documents stronger isolation, jailbreak testing and alignment checks, including honeypots for unauthorized scope expansion, and says a paused large reinforcement-learning run resumed on August 28.

Google Cloud Security Blog July 21, 2026 tool

Now in preview: Find and fix software vulnerabilities with CodeMender

Google opened a preview of CodeMender, an AI code-security agent delivered through Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and AI Threat Defense. It is designed to inspect code, identify and validate potentially exploitable defects, and produce targeted fixes, with Google’s specialized Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model initially restricted to governments and trusted partners.

OpenAI News June 23, 2026 framework

Helping build shared standards for advanced AI

OpenAI describes the Linux Foundation-hosted Appia effort to turn international standards and established AI frameworks into modular assessment criteria across models, infrastructure, and applications. It highlights a reusable evaluation disclosure set: identify the system, tool access, harness, capability-elicitation methods, available resources, and checks used to validate results.

OpenAI News August 7, 2026 analysis

Responding to the next frontier of critical cyber capabilities

Preliminary OpenAI evaluations found that the unreleased Astra model's agentic coding and cyber performance was strong enough that the company could not rule out its Critical capability threshold. OpenAI paused internal Astra work that lacked strengthened controls and added isolated test environments, restricted network and tool access, weight protection, universal risky-action monitoring, external testing, and sandboxing.

OpenAI News September 22, 2026 framework

Scoping third-party AI safety assessments: claims, access and evidence

OpenAI proposes independent assessments of safety cases, safeguards, capability evaluations and misalignment incidents. Its principles call for preregistered claims, proportionate access, disclosed conflicts, transparent methods and explicit limits. Much of the proposed work is longer-term and separate from launch decisions; this is not an assessment result.

SecurityWeek AI Security September 2, 2026 tool

OpenLeash Adds a Human Check to Risky AI Agent Actions

SecurityWeek profiles OpenLeash, an authorization layer that evaluates proposed agent actions and can block them or request human approval. The project’s public repository provides a personal runtime using agent hooks and provider traffic, with a decision engine, local history and desktop integration. Its hosted business control plane is outside that repository. Public implementation materials make it inspectable, while the profile offers no independent efficacy benchmark.

Google DeepMind Blog August 27, 2026 framework

Piloting the world's first double-blind AI evaluations

Google DeepMind, Singapore's AI Safety Institute, OpenMined, AVERI, and MLCommons are piloting an external evaluation in a confidential-computing environment. The evaluator's hidden tests and Google's Gemini Flash Lite weights remain private from one another, reducing benchmark contamination without transferring either sensitive asset.

OpenAI News August 19, 2026 framework

Offering Zero Data Retention for frontier models

OpenAI previews Private Safety Processing for eligible Zero Data Retention deployments: automated systems correlate risk across related interactions while content stays on customer infrastructure or in OpenAI storage encrypted with customer-controlled keys. OpenAI receives a limited risk signal rather than prompt content; the design is still in early testing.

OpenAI February 5, 2026 analysis

GPT-5.3-Codex system card: separate model behavior from execution controls

This February 2026 system card documents historical evaluations of destructive actions and cyber safeguards alongside sandbox and network controls. OpenAI distinguishes model training from the surrounding execution and monitoring layers, and cautions that challenging evaluation sets do not represent ordinary production error rates. The report is useful as an evaluation-design reference; it is not a description of current product defaults or a guarantee for a new deployment.

Crawlable archive: every entry is also available through the server-rendered archive pages. Continue with entries 25–48.