Jeff Smith describes exposing established parameterized reports through discovery and execution tools, with arbitrary SQL disabled where appropriate. This narrows query-generation errors but still leaves report-selection mistakes. He also separates read-only access from permission to read particular records and places enforcement in the database. Performance-tuning advice uses a separate environment rather than unrestricted production changes.
Database tools for agents: constrain queries and enforce access before results leave
Related research
More curated notes connected through Agent Security and AI Engineering.
OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026
OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.
A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap
The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.
FinBot CTF Is Live: A Hands-On Companion to the OWASP GenAI Security Project
OWASP FinBot is a hands-on agentic-security CTF built around a simulated multi-agent financial-services platform with real tool access. Its challenges cover prompt injection, tool misuse, policy bypass, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, remote code execution, shared context, and compromised MCP servers.