Drawing on nine years of cross-industry ML deployments, Megan Robertson explains why a statistically accurate model can still fail to deliver in production. The session moves beyond offline performance to scoping, organizational failure modes, monitoring, maintainability, and the operational conditions required for a model to keep producing useful results.
Why Great Models Fail: Lessons From 9 Years of Deploying ML Models - Megan Robertson
Related research
More curated notes connected through Model Evaluation and AI Engineering.
OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework
OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.
A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap
The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.
Now in preview: Find and fix software vulnerabilities with CodeMender
Google opened a preview of CodeMender, an AI code-security agent delivered through Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and AI Threat Defense. It is designed to inspect code, identify and validate potentially exploitable defects, and produce targeted fixes, with Google’s specialized Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model initially restricted to governments and trusted partners.