AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
Adversa AI Trusted AI Blog · October 13, 2026

October GenAI security reading map: test safeguards and surrounding controls

analysis AI Red TeamingAdversarial MLModel Evaluation
Why it matters

Adversa’s October digest organizes research on jailbreaks, retrieval poisoning, model-serving flaws, and defensive controls. Linked primary work on GLM-5.3 safeguards, Unsloth model inspection, and OWASP control mappings gives teams concrete starting points for assessment. Use the collection to find the underlying experiments and implementation details; attack rates from different models and test conditions are not a common benchmark.

My takeaway: Choose a failure mode relevant to your deployment and read its primary source. Record affected versions, attacker access, and evaluation limits, then add a controlled regression case. Check model-loading code permissions and management-endpoint access separately from refusal behavior; a framework mapping still needs implementation evidence.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Adversarial ML.

OpenAI News · framework

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OpenAI News · framework

A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI

OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.