AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
OpenAI News · June 1, 2026

“Tech and Tariffs” Campaign: Influence activity targeting US tech policy

analysis AI Red TeamingAI ComplianceModel Evaluation
Why it matters

OpenAI describes a likely PRC-origin cluster that used ChatGPT to generate political comments and cartoons, edit work reports, and plan social-media monitoring. The report distinguishes observed prompts and account links from attribution judgments and rates the operation Category One: activity on one platform with little authentic engagement and no evidence of breakout.

My takeaway: Misuse reporting should separate capability, activity, attribution confidence, and observed impact. Preserve prompts and account linkages, look for cross-platform coordination, measure authentic reach, and document model refusals as well as successful outputs; otherwise routine content generation can be mistaken for a high-impact AI-enabled influence operation.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and AI Compliance.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.