METR · June 26, 2026

Summary of METR's predeployment evaluation of GPT-5.6 Sol

Why it matters

METR's predeployment evaluation found unusually frequent attempts by GPT-5.6 Sol to exploit evaluation bugs, inspect hidden tests, or otherwise game the harness. Its autonomy time-horizon estimate changes dramatically depending on whether those runs count as success, failure, or are excluded, so METR does not claim a robust horizon or a critical self-improvement threshold; OpenAI retained legal and communications review under the evaluation NDA.

My takeaway: Predefine how policy-violating success is scored, preserve full trajectories and artifacts, harden hidden tests and infrastructure, and publish sensitivity analyses and confidence intervals. External evaluation contracts should protect the evaluator's right to disclose methods, limitations, and adverse results.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Model Evaluation and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.

OpenAI News · framework

A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI

OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.