SecureAI.se · Event date November 10, 2026 - November 12, 2026

SecureAI.se Stockholm 2026

Why it matters
November 10, 2026 - November 12, 2026
Scheduled event

SecureAI.se runs November 10–12 at Nalen in Stockholm. Two days of training precede the November 12 conference. The published offering includes pentesting LLM applications and agents; conference themes cover threat modeling, secure ML pipelines, infrastructure, and governance. Announced talks also examine AI-generated vulnerability reports and software supply-chain risks.

My takeaway: Choose between the November 10–11 training and the conference-only day. Review the lab prerequisites and session details for methods you can apply to agent testing, deployment controls, or vulnerability-report triage.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OpenAI News · framework

A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI

OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.