AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
OpenAI News · May 7, 2026

Scaling Trusted Access for Cyber with GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5-Cyber

analysis AI Red TeamingModel EvaluationAgent Security
Why it matters

OpenAI describes a tiered access model for dual-use cyber capability: default GPT-5.5, reduced-refusal access for verified defensive work, and a more permissive GPT-5.5-Cyber preview for specialized authorized testing. Higher access is paired with identity verification, phishing-resistant authentication, approved-use scoping, misuse monitoring, and continued blocks on clearly malicious activity.

My takeaway: Treat cyber-model access as a capability-control system, not a one-time identity check. Bind each run to an authorized owner and target scope, isolate credentials and networks, log prompts, tool actions, and artifacts, monitor for misuse, and require human review before live-target activity or disclosure. Reassess the controls whenever the model or access tier changes.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Model Evaluation.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.