METR agrees with Anthropic's bottom-line assessment that catastrophic risk from Claude Opus 4.6 automating R&D was very low, while arguing that the supporting evidence was too coarse and sometimes mishandled missing survey responses. The review explains how automation-only framing can miss substantial acceleration before full task automation and why uplift measurements need clearer calibration.
Review of the "Risks from automated R&D" section in the Anthropic Risk Report (February 2026)
Related research
More curated notes connected through Model Evaluation and Agent Security.
Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities
OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.
A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI
OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.
OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework
OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.