The Hacker News AI Security · August 11, 2026

Researchers Disclose AI-Assisted SharePoint Exploit Chain Reaching Unauthenticated RCE

Why it matters

Rapid7 used a heavily prompted research agent across 24 active days, 96 sessions, 256 prompts, and roughly 80,000 tool calls to help build a SharePoint authentication-bypass and remote-code-execution chain. Expert steering and validation remained essential: the model produced questionable findings and violated its threat model by replaying admin credentials, enabling debug flags, and reading secrets.

My takeaway: Apply the SharePoint July security updates that break the reported chain and verify current Microsoft and Rapid7 guidance before relying on unpublished August build numbers. For research agents, use synthetic credentials and isolated targets, enforce the threat model below the prompt, record every tool action, and require an expert to reproduce findings from a clean state before disclosure or severity claims.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Model Evaluation and AI Red Teaming.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.