AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
NVIDIA AI Red Team · January 30, 2026

Practical Security Guidance for Sandboxing Agentic Workflows and Managing Execution Risk

analysis AI Red TeamingAgent SecurityPrompt Injection
Why it matters

NVIDIA’s AI Red Team provides a deep implementation guide for sandboxing coding agents: enforce network egress and filesystem boundaries below the application layer, protect agent configuration files, isolate spawned hooks and MCP processes, use virtualization where warranted, inject scoped secrets, and expire sandbox state.

My takeaway: Start with three non-overridable controls: deny arbitrary egress, deny writes outside the workspace, and deny every agent write to executable configuration. Then sandbox the IDE and all child processes, restrict reads, broker short-lived task credentials, require fresh approval for each default-deny exception, destroy accumulated state on a defined schedule, and test the controls through indirect execution paths.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.