AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
AAAI/ACM AIES · Event date October 12, 2026 - October 14, 2026

AAAI/ACM AIES 2026

event upcoming AI ComplianceModel EvaluationAI Engineering
Why it matters
October 12, 2026 - October 14, 2026
Scheduled event

The ninth AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society convenes technical, legal, philosophical, and social-science research in Malmö. The 2026 program examines the governance and societal consequences of AI systems as they move from experimental tools into entrenched infrastructure.

My takeaway: Use AIES to strengthen the assumptions around technical controls: who is affected, which harms and power relationships an evaluation omits, what accountability survives deployment, and how legal or organizational duties become measurable lifecycle evidence. Keep normative arguments distinct from empirical findings.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Compliance and Model Evaluation.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OpenAI News · framework

Cybersecurity in the Intelligence Age

OpenAI proposes a five-pillar strategy for AI-enabled cyber defense: tiered access for trusted defenders, faster government-industry coordination, stronger protection of frontier models and infrastructure, risk-scaled deployment monitoring, and broader defensive support for individuals and small organizations.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.