ACM AISec · Event date November 15, 2026

ACM AISec 2026

Why it matters
November 15, 2026
Scheduled event

The 19th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security is listed for November 15 in ACM CCS registration, alongside related workshops in The Hague. It covers adversarial ML, model privacy, AI misuse, foundation-model red teaming, dangerous-capability evaluation, deceptive alignment, multi-agent risk, and autonomous-agent containment.

My takeaway: AISec is a high-value research pipeline because accepted work must state its threat model and is published archivally. Review its program alongside the adjacent agent-security, large-model privacy and safety, and deepfake-security workshops; prioritize papers with released artifacts and adaptive attackers.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Adversarial ML and AI Red Teaming.

OpenAI News · framework

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.

OpenAI News · framework

A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI

OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.