AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
METR · February 10, 2026

A computational AI-timeline model makes automation assumptions inspectable

analysis Model EvaluationAI Engineering
Why it matters

METR’s February 2026 modeling note builds a compact forecast of AI research automation from research labor, compute and software efficiency. Its equations connect capability progress to the share of tasks automated while representing remaining human work as a bottleneck. The accompanying model is useful for examining sensitivity to automation speed and research returns. The headline date follows selected parameter assumptions, many based on judgment, rather than an observed capability threshold. The model omits important effects, including parts of research judgment and the wider economy, and does not establish when real research organizations will become autonomous.

My takeaway: Use the model to compare conditional scenarios and expose which assumptions drive a timeline. Keep parameter uncertainty and omitted bottlenecks visible instead of adopting the headline year as a deployment forecast.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Model Evaluation and AI Engineering.

OpenAI News · framework

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

OpenAI says preliminary evidence that Astra may meet its Critical cybersecurity threshold led it to pause frontier reinforcement-learning work for two weeks and keep its largest planned run on hold. New safeguards include stronger workload and network isolation, continuous boundary testing, token-level monitoring that escalates suspicious tool activity, and broader alignment checks for deception, reward hacking, and unauthorized access.

OpenAI News · framework

A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI

OpenAI proposes a three-part U.S. frontier-AI governance model: harmonize emerging state safety laws into a federal baseline, strengthen CAISI as an evaluation and standards institution, and coordinate a broader resilience program. Proposed controls include severe-risk evaluations, transparency reports, independent audits, safety-incident reporting, model-weight security, whistleblower protection, and periodic technical assessments.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.